During RFK Jr's Joe Rogan Interview (below), at the 58:14 mark, he mentioned the Simpsonwood cover-up. He also mentioned you can find more information about it on the Children's Health Defense Website. You can see links for that information further down the page.
JRE 1999 - ROBERT KENNEDY, JR. (RFK)
- FEBRUARY 12, 2017
The Truth Behind the Vaccine Cover-Up
On June 7-8, 2000 a secret conference was held at the Simpsonwood Conference Center in Norcross, Georgia to discuss a study examining the link between increasing doses of Thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders. The study was done using the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) database, an official governmental data bank collecting patient vaccination information on the children from the health maintenance organizations (HMOs) being paid to participate.
THE SIMPSONWOOD COVERUP
2/7/2017 Simpsonwood Documents
My name is Walter Orenstein. I’m Director of the National Immunization Program at CDC and I want to thank all of you for coming here and taking time out of your very busy schedules to spend the next day and a half with us. Not only do we thank you for taking time out, but […]
5/4/2023 The Simpsonwood Meeting: 23 Years Later
The vaccine-autism connection was covered up 23 years ago, and the lie continues today. Join us in Georgia for a two-days of rallies, marches, speakers and community.
5/31/2023 23 Years After Closed-Door ‘Simpsonwood Meeting,’ CHD Leads Rally to Highlight Corruption in Vaccine Industry, Government Agencies
Children’s Health Defense and other grassroots groups on June 7-8 will host a rally to mark the 23rd anniversary of the closed-door “Simpsonwood meeting” during which vaccine industry leaders and public health officials elected to conceal evidence of the link between mercury-based thimerosal vaccines and autism.
8/20/2018 A Historical Overview—Pre-1999 to 2006 Chapter 2
Chapter II: 1999-2000 Simpsonwood “the number of dose related relationships [between mercury and autism] are linear and statistically significant. You can play with this all you want. They are linear. They are statistically significant.” – Dr. William Weil, American Academy of Pediatrics. Simpsonwood, GA, June 7, 2000 “the number of dose related relationships [between mercury […]
7/1/2019 Fully Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated — Part 2
The data in CDC’s 1999 Verstraeten study clearly inculpated thimerosal as the principle culprit behind the autism epidemic. Contemporary emails among CDC officials— obtained under the FOIA— and the transcripts from a secret 2000 meeting between government regulators and vaccine makers at Simpsonwood, Georgia, show HHS officials plotting to create phony studies to exonerate vaccines. CDC officials hired a Scandanavian, Poul Thorsen, giving him $10 million to create a series of fraudulent reports from Denmark.
9/27/2017 Deadly Immunity – Government Cover-up of a Mercury/Autism Scandal
Children's Health Defense note: With the ongoing mainstream media blackout on questions regarding vaccine safety, we want to remind our followers of the publication--and subsequent retraction--of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s 2005 article “Deadly Immunity” in Salon. The history of repression of crucial vaccine safety data runs deep. The article laid out the scientific link between thimerosal and childhood neurological disorders and published explosive excerpts from the transcripts from the CDC’s secretive June 2000 Simpsonwood conference which brought together government public health officials, vaccine manufacturers and professional medical associations.
2/12/2017 The Truth Behind the Vaccine Cover-Up
On June 7-8, 2000 a secret conference was held at the Simpsonwood Conference Center in Norcross, Georgia to discuss a study examining the link between increasing doses of Thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders. The study was done using the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) database, an official governmental data bank collecting patient vaccination information on the children […]
The truth behind the vaccine cover-up R.L. Blaylock/Medical Veritas 5 (2008) 1714–1726 doi: 10.1588/medver.2008.05.00181 1714 ! Russell L. Blaylock, MD Website: www.russellblaylockmd.com Abstract
On June 7-8, 2000 a secret conference was held at the Simpsonwood Conference Center in Norcross, Georgia to discuss a study examining the link between increasing doses of Thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders.
The study was done using the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) database, an official governmental data bank collecting patient vaccination information on the children from the health maintenance organizations (HMOs) being paid to participate.
Attending were 51 scientists, representatives of pharmaceutical vaccine manufacturing companies and a representative of the World Health Organization; the public and the media were unlawfully excluded.
The conclusions of this meeting were quite startling, since it confirmed a dose-response link between Thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders that held up to rigorous statistical analyses.
In their discussion, they make plain why the meeting was held in secret: the conclusions would have destroyed the public’s confidence in the vaccine program, and more importantly, their faith in vaccine authorities.
When the results of this study were published three years later in the journal Pediatrics, the “problem” had been fixed, in that by adding another set of data from a third HMO, reorganizing the criteria for inclusion and restructuring the patient groupings, a less than statistically significant link was demonstrated.
In my analysis I discuss the more outrageous statements made during the meeting and how accepted experts in the field of mercury neurotoxicity were excluded from the meeting.
CLICK HERE to rewad the FULL REPORT
52:40
What happened in
52:42
the, in around 1999, the
52:46
vaccine schedule immediately
52:48
after they passed, the vaccine act exploded
52:51
because all these companies were rushing to get new
52:53
vaccines onto the schedule.
52:55
Many of them for diseases that weren't even
52:57
casually contagious, like ridiculous
53:00
diseases that are in that, like hepatitis B, why
53:02
would you give, you get the hepatitis B from,
53:04
you know, from sharing
53:07
needles or from like going to a really
53:09
seasoned prostitute or from, you know,
53:14
sort of compulsive homosexual
53:17
behavior.
53:19
Oh, you, but a baby, a baby
53:22
can get it if they get it from their mom,
53:24
but every mom is tested.
53:26
So, you know, at the hospital, every
53:29
mom, every pregnant woman is tested for it. So
53:31
the baby doesn't need this. Is there a treatment
53:33
for when they do get it? Yeah.
53:36
But,
53:37
but the thing is, but why would you give it
53:39
to a one day old baby, you know,
53:41
or a three hour old baby, and then four
53:43
more times when that baby's not going to be
53:46
even subject to it for 16 years
53:48
and it may not even, I
53:51
mean, originally what happened is Merck
53:54
and CDC designed this for
53:57
prostitutes and for male homosexuals.
53:59
excuse me, I'm a sexualist, and
54:02
they couldn't sell any, because those cohorts
54:05
had other better things to do with their money, and
54:07
they weren't going to buy the vaccine.
54:10
Oh, CDC went, or Merck went
54:12
back to CDC and said we built all these plants,
54:15
and we got the thing, and got it approved, and
54:17
we're a billion dollars in.
54:20
What are you going to do? And CDC said, well, just recommend
54:22
it for children.
54:23
And that way, they keep what they call the
54:25
warm production lines.
54:29
They keep the vaccine. They
54:33
like to have a lot of vaccines in case
54:35
there's emergency. They have a lot of lines out
54:37
there that they can manufacture a pandemic
54:40
response on. This is what they say.
54:43
So anyway,
54:44
all of these new crazy diseases,
54:47
rotavirus, and we're all put on
54:49
the schedule.
54:52
And then
54:54
they started seeing all of this explosion
54:57
in chronic disease, and particularly
54:59
autism. So around 1995, CDC, Congress said
55:01
to EPA, what
55:06
year did the autism epidemic begin? And
55:09
EPA is a captured agency, but it's
55:11
captured by the coal industry and the oil
55:13
and the pesticide industry, but not by the pharma,
55:15
because it doesn't regulate pharma. So
55:18
it actually did a real science, and it
55:20
said, 1989 is the year the epidemic
55:23
began. It's a red line. And 1989
55:25
was the year the vaccine schedule exploded.
55:28
That doesn't mean that's a correlation. It
55:30
does not mean causation, but
55:32
it is something that should be looked at.
55:36
So, and NIH decided
55:38
to look at it because women were
55:40
saying it was the vaccine. Again
55:43
and again and again and again and again and again and again,
55:45
women were coming with the same story
55:47
that I had a perfectly
55:49
healthy two-year-old, exceeded all my Ismael's
55:52
bounds.
55:53
I gave them on their second birthday, their
55:55
18th month wellness visit, the full
55:58
battery of six or eight vaccines.
55:59
and that child spikes
56:02
a fever that night, has a seizure,
56:04
and over the next three months loses their language,
56:07
loses their capacity, make
56:09
eye contact, finger point, social
56:12
interactions in languages disappear. And
56:14
it happened so many times that NIH
56:16
was saying, we gotta look to see if it's the vaccine.
56:19
And CDC was, so CDC hired
56:22
a Belgian epidemiologist
56:27
named Thomas Verstraten. And
56:30
they opened up the Vaccine Safety Datalink,
56:32
which is the biggest database
56:35
for vaccines, for HMOs. All
56:37
the, the top 10 HMOs have all
56:39
their records in there. So they have all your vaccination
56:41
records and all your health claims. So you can
56:43
do these kinds of cluster analyses. And
56:47
Verstraten went in there and he looked at one thing.
56:50
He looked at children who got
56:52
the hepatitis B vaccine within their first
56:54
month of life and
56:56
compared those health outcomes in
56:58
children who did not, in other words, children who got
57:01
it after 30 days
57:03
or didn't get it at all. That was the second cohort.
57:07
What he found in his first run through
57:09
the data is there was an 1135% greater or elevated
57:11
risk for
57:16
an autism diagnosis among the kids who'd gotten
57:18
it in their first 30 days. At
57:21
that point, they knew what caused the autism epidemic
57:24
because a relative risk, it's
57:26
called a relative risk of 11.35. A
57:31
relative risk of two is
57:33
considered proof of causation. As long
57:35
as there's biological plausibility. A
57:38
relative, the relative risk
57:40
of smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years
57:42
and getting lung cancer is 10.
57:45
This was 11.35.
57:47
So there was a panic
57:49
throughout the industry. This, you know, as
57:52
people heard about this study, the
57:54
CDC wanted to a meeting with
57:56
all of the big panjorums in the industry.
57:59
They didn't want to do it on CDC campus
58:02
because then they thought it would be subject
58:05
to a freedom of information law request. They
58:07
wanted to do it just to keep it secret. So
58:09
they found this retreat
58:11
center, Methodist retreat center in Norcross,
58:14
Georgia called Simpsonwood and they assembled,
58:16
I think there was 72 people there
58:19
and they were from the WHO, CDC,
58:21
NIH, FDA, and
58:25
all the vaccine companies and
58:28
all the big academics, the people who basically
58:31
developed vaccines in the academic institutions
58:33
and they were all there. And
58:35
they spend the first day, they
58:38
give them all a copy of the first run of the study but
58:40
they have to give it all back because they don't want it out
58:42
there. And then they
58:44
have a day of talking about it where
58:46
they're all saying,
58:48
holy cow, this is real and
58:51
the lawyers
58:53
are going to come after us.
58:55
We're all in trouble and
58:57
then they spend the second day talking about how to
58:59
hide it. How
59:02
do you know this? Because somebody made a
59:04
recording of it
59:05
and I got ahold of the transcripts and
59:08
I published excerpts from those transcripts
59:10
in Rolling Stone. And anybody can go and
59:13
read these now on our website, it's called Simpsonwood.
59:16
You can read through the whole thing or you can read my
59:18
Rolling Stone article which is also
59:21
on the website which summarizes it. But
59:25
anyway, and check if you
59:28
think it's true or not. But
59:31
they, so then I read
59:33
that,
59:33
when I read that then I was like, okay,
59:37
I got to drop everything and do something about
59:39
this. And I published this article
59:42
in Rolling Stone and
59:45
I was kind of shocked by just
59:47
the power of the reaction against
59:49
it, of people coming after
59:51
Rolling Stone and Salon which
59:53
also published and were
59:55
just bulldozed with these hate
59:58
reactions and then Salon.
59:59
on six years later six years of the
1:00:02
date by the way there
1:00:06
were four corrections i think four or
1:00:08
five corrections in the article in the next
1:00:10
week
1:00:11
all of those corrections
1:00:14
were made by the art the editors of salon
1:00:17
and rolling stone and i think they've sent
1:00:19
me letters which are also on our website
1:00:22
saying this none by
1:00:24
me uh... but from
1:00:26
then on they said all kennedy it was loaded
1:00:28
with mistakes and six years later salon
1:00:31
under pressure from the pharmaceutical industry takes
1:00:33
it down as
1:00:35
as we found mistakes but they never
1:00:37
such showed any mistakes they wouldn't have never
1:00:39
i've said repeatedly to him show me one mistake
1:00:42
in that published piece show me one
1:00:44
and they have not been able to do it and then they
1:00:47
also forget that the four mistakes that they've
1:00:49
met you know were found that you
1:00:51
know that's uh... that we printed a rat
1:00:53
a for that rolling stone printer at a four and
1:00:56
we're all made by them and
1:00:58
that because they added my sixteen thousand
1:01:01
word piece down to a three thousand word piece
1:01:03
and when they were doing that they made some errors
1:01:08
so then i'm so
1:01:10
then uh... you
1:01:14
but what what happened after that
1:01:16
is you had this
1:01:18
explosion in chronic disease so
1:01:21
that so and
1:01:23
this is something everybody does the mother's a punchline
1:01:27
and this what everybody needs to focus on nineteen
1:01:31
sixties when i was a kid six
1:01:33
percent of americans had chronic disease what
1:01:37
do i mean by chronic disease basically
1:01:39
three categories plus obesity
1:01:42
one neurological disorders eighty d
1:01:44
eighty hd speech delay language like
1:01:46
text red syndrome narcolepsy as
1:01:49
the autism autism
1:01:52
went from one in ten thousand
1:01:54
in my generation it's still one in ten thousand
1:01:56
my generation i how old you
1:01:59
fifty five Well, I bet that you've never
1:02:01
met anybody with full-blown autism your
1:02:03
age, you know, head banging,
1:02:06
football or a helmet on, non
1:02:09
toilet, trained, nonverbal. I mean,
1:02:11
I've never met anybody like that my age, but
1:02:13
in my kid's age, now one in every 34
1:02:15
kids has, has autism
1:02:18
and a half of those are full-blown, meaning that
1:02:20
description. Now what's the conventional
1:02:23
explanation for that? Well,
1:02:25
I mean, there, there's no
1:02:28
real explanation. You know,
1:02:30
how do they try to, they
1:02:32
try to say, well, we're just noticing it
1:02:34
more, which is ridiculous because first
1:02:37
of all, there's all kinds of studies that say that
1:02:39
the, you know, really good studies like, uh,
1:02:43
over here hurts, but shut up. It was a very famous
1:02:45
scientist, epidemiologist, biostatistician
1:02:48
who was commissioned by the California
1:02:50
state legislature to answer
1:02:53
that question. She's at the UC,
1:02:55
uh, at the mind Institute at UC Davis.
1:02:57
And she came back and said, no, the, the epidemic
1:03:00
is real. It's not, you know, better diagnostic
1:03:03
or changing diagnostic criteria. And
1:03:06
so, and that, you know, any
1:03:09
real scientists now, even the big backers
1:03:11
like Paul off at one, I don't think even
1:03:13
he will say that, but nobody from CDC
1:03:16
is actually going to stand up and say that
1:03:18
they certainly won't debate the point.
1:03:21
But even more so, if,
1:03:23
if it's one,
1:03:25
if, if it's not an epidemic, then
1:03:27
where are all, where are the one in 34, 69 year old
1:03:29
men who
1:03:33
are wearing helmets and non toilet
1:03:35
train? You know, if you got autism,
1:03:37
you live forever. It
1:03:40
doesn't affect life span. You're
1:03:42
going to, these kids are going to be around forever
1:03:45
and they, and, but there's nobody
1:03:47
my age who looks like that. So if
1:03:49
it was, if it was really better recognition,
1:03:51
you'd see it in every age group, not just
1:03:53
in children. Not
1:03:56
only that, but it changes every year. It gets worse
1:03:58
and worse every year. So they can't keep.
1:03:59
saying, oh, we're just noticing it for the first
1:04:02
time. And also, you
1:04:04
know, how does it get worse every year? How
1:04:06
does it get worse every year? Because, you know,
1:04:08
the CDC releases
1:04:11
new data. It's called the ADM. It's
1:04:14
a monitoring system.
1:04:16
And there's been all kinds of scandals with that
1:04:19
because the CDC tries to manipulate
1:04:21
the data.
1:04:22
And there's all kinds of whistleblowers from the
1:04:24
different states who say that they're pressured
1:04:26
to not report cases and that kind
1:04:28
of thing. But the
1:04:31
CDC releases new data every year.
1:04:33
And every year, it gets worse. It goes from,
1:04:35
you know, it's now, I think, 1 in 22 boys. Has
1:04:38
the rate of vaccinations
1:04:41
changed as a schedule change? Yeah, the
1:04:44
rates of vaccinations have gone up. And,
1:04:46
you know, mercury has been removed
1:04:48
from a lot of the vaccines. But
1:04:52
there's aluminum in those vaccines, which, you
1:04:54
know, operates along the same biological
1:04:57
path and does the same kind of damage.
1:04:59
It's extremely neurotoxic. And then there's
1:05:01
other things, lots of other toxics
1:05:04
in the vaccines that, you know, could
1:05:06
be
1:05:07
responsible. I mean, there's lots, there's hundreds
1:05:09
and hundreds of scientific studies that looked at it, but
1:05:12
nobody ever reports them. Well,
1:05:14
I did a book in which I
1:05:16
have 450 studies that
1:05:19
are digested in that book, you know,
1:05:21
that I summarize
1:05:22
and cite. And 1,400
1:05:25
references. And everybody
1:05:27
will say, oh, there's no study that shows autism
1:05:30
and vaccines are connected. That's just crazy. You
1:05:32
know, that's people who
1:05:34
are not looking at science. So
1:05:37
anyway, But they want to say that. They want
1:05:39
to say that. It's like, it's just part
1:05:41
of the religion. Yes, that's exactly
1:05:43
what it is. It really does seem
1:05:46
like a religion. And the heretics have
1:05:48
to be burned at the stake. They have to be
1:05:50
humiliated, silenced, destroyed.
1:05:53
Oh, it is, you know, trust
1:05:55
in the trust the experts.
1:05:59
is not a function of science.
No comments:
Post a Comment