Thursday, August 22, 2024

How Kamala and Biden's Pride, and Hatred of Trump actually HURT US... A LOT!

When you're a politician who's supposed to be LEADING your country, you're not supposed to make decisions out of PRIDE. Leaders are supposed to make decisions based on FACTS and DATA. That's what RFK does, but sadly, we can't say the same about Kamala. She is STILL requiring up-to-date vaccinations for her employees, while ignoring all the data that they can be very dangerous for people!

And Kamala Harris is still mandating vaccines for people on her staff... despite the fact that the SCIENCE clearly shown to increase the risk for cancerblood clots, and sudden heart attacks



It is reckless to have a high level position in the white house, and make a comment to hundreds of millions of people, when it's based off real misinformation. Hydroxychloroquine has been proven to save countless lives, but Harris either didn't research it herself, or she'd rather just continue pushing drugs that bring in far more profits for our government. 

It's a known fact that she kept people in prison much longer than they should have been there, because they were making money for our government as CHEAP LABOR. So... I guess she doesn't mind putting profits before people!

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/kamala-harris-labels-trump-a-drug-pusher-for-touting-the-promise-of-hydroxychloroquine/

Kamala Harris Labels Trump a ‘Drug-Pusher’ for Touting Hydroxychloroquine

Senator Kamala Harris listens to a question from the audience during a forum in Las Vegas, Nev., October 2, 2019. (Steve Marcus/Reuters)
Share

Senator Kamala Harris (D., Calif.) on Wednesday labeled President Trump a ‘drug-pusher’ for continually touting hydroxychloroquine as a possible treatment for coronavirus.

“The president keeps taking the stage and as opposed to what Dr. [Anthony] Fauci and medical health professionals are telling us, pushing this drug,” Harris said on The View. “He’s got to stop — he’s not — we don’t want a drug pusher for president.”

Hydroxychloroquine is an anti-malarial drug that anecdotal reports indicate has been effective in treating some coronavirus patients. There has not, however, been conclusive clinical evidence of its efficacy. The New York Times on Tuesday touted Trump’s “small personal financial interest” in a French company that produces the drug, even though Trump’s investment in the company amounts to roughly $1,000.

“I certainly understand why the president is pushing it,” Dr. Joshua Rosenberg of Brooklyn Hospital Center said in a different Times article on Monday. “He’s the president of the United States. He has to project hope….So I’m not faulting him for pushing it even if there isn’t a lot of science behind it, because it is, at this point, the best, most available option for use.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has cautioned against investing too much faith in the drug.

“I think we’ve got to be careful that we don’t make that majestic leap to assume that this is a knockout drug,” Fauci told Fox News on Friday. “We still need to do the kinds of studies that definitively prove whether any intervention, not just this one, any intervention is truly safe and effective.”

Fauci and economic adviser Peter Navarro, both members of the White House Coronavirus Task Force, sparred on Saturday over the drug’s effectiveness during a meeting. Navarro was apparently incensed that Fauci maintained that hydroxychloroquine’s effectiveness was not scientifically proven.

“It was pretty clear that everyone was just trying to get Peter to sit down and stop being so confrontational,” a person familiar with the meeting told Axios.

New York governor Andrew Cuomo on Monday said he would ask Trump to increase the supply of hydroxychloroquine to the state’s hospitals. The state is a coronavirus hotspot,

“There has been anecdotal evidence that it is promising,” Cuomo told reporters, while noting the drug’s effectiveness has not yet been scientifically proven.


https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harris-dangerous-vaccine-game/

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/vp-debate-coverage-fact-check-10-07-20/index.html


Kamala Harris directly said on Wednesday that if there is a coronavirus vaccine available during Donald Trump’s administration that is not embraced by scientific advisers but pushed by the President, she will not take it.

But if the scientific advisers like Dr. Anthony Fauci back the vaccine, she would.

The Trump campaign has slammed Harris during the campaign for questioning a vaccine approved by Trump.




On the coronavirus vaccine:

  • Pence: “The fact that you continue to undermine public confidence in a vaccine, if a vaccine emerges during the Trump administration, I think is unconscionable,” Pence said. “Senator, I just ask you, stop playing politics with people’s lives.”
  • Harris: “If Dr. Fauci, if the doctors tell us that we should take it, I’ll be the first in line to take it. Absolutely,” Harris said. “But if Donald Trump tells us to take it, I’m not taking it.”




Kamala Harris’s Dangerous Vaccine Game

Share

On numerous occasions during the vice-presidential debate, Kamala Harris said that Democrats would listen and follow the “science.” Her cynically dangerous answer on vaccines says otherwise.

Given an opportunity to walk back her previous attacks on massive private-public efforts to come up with a COVID vaccine, Harris doubled down, saying, “If Donald Trump tells us to take it, I’m not taking it.”

What does that even mean? Harris knows that Trump isn’t cooking up a serum in the basement of the White House. She knows that big pharma isn’t going to intentionally release unsafe vaccines to destroy their companies. She knows that Trump can’t force the FDA to release those unsafe vaccines. She, and others, are generating doubt about a potentially life-saving drug to win an election.

Please read Ellen Carmichael’s excellent deep dive into the consequences of sowing distrust over vaccines. Polls now show that only half of Americans say they would get a COVID-19 vaccine. So what happens if Trump wins? What happens with therapeutics? Democrats and the media have been scaring Americans over safe and prescribed drugs like Hydroxychloroquine simply because the president champions it. Eli Lilly is close to releasing antibody therapy that reduced virus levels and hospitalizations. What happens if Trump says “take it?” Will Harris say don’t? It’s just an insane position.











75 Posts

Here are some key lines from the first and only 2020 vice presidential debate

Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris and Vice President Mike Pence wave before the vice presidential debate on Wednesday, October 7, at Kingsbury Hall on the campus of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City.

The vice presidential debate between Mike Pence and Kamala Harris has wrapped. The candidates debated for 90 minutes about several topics, including coronavirus, the economy, foreign policy, race and police reform.

Harris made history tonight, becoming the first Black and South Asian woman to participate in a general election debate.

If you are just reading in, here are some key moments from the showdown: 

On President Trump’s taxes:

  • Harris: “Just so everyone is clear, when we say in debt, it means you owe money to somebody. It would be really good to know who the President of the United States, the commander-in-chief, owes money to,” Harris said. “Because the American people have a right to know what is influencing the President’s decisions. And is he making those decisions on the best interests of the American people, of you, or self-interest?”
  • Pence: “The American people have a President who a businessman, a job creator. He’s paid tens of millions of dollar in taxes, payroll, property taxes. Creating tens of thousands of American jobs. The President said the reports are not accurate. The President’s also released stacks of financial disclosures, the American people can review just as the law allows,” the vice president said.

On the coronavirus vaccine:

  • Pence: “The fact that you continue to undermine public confidence in a vaccine, if a vaccine emerges during the Trump administration, I think is unconscionable,” Pence said. “Senator, I just ask you, stop playing politics with people’s lives.”
  • Harris: “If Dr. Fauci, if the doctors tell us that we should take it, I’ll be the first in line to take it. Absolutely,” Harris said. “But if Donald Trump tells us to take it, I’m not taking it.”

On adding seats to the Supreme Court:

  • Pence: “This is a classic case of, if you can’t win by the rules, you’re going to change the rules,” Pence said, turning to Harris and asking directly if she and Biden were “going to pack the Supreme Court to get your way?”
  • Harris: “Joe and I are very clear: The American people are voting right now. And it should be their decision about who will serve on (the court) … for a lifetime,” she said.

On police violence and the death of Breonna Taylor:

  • Harris: “I’ve talked with Breonna’s mother and her family, and her family deserves justice. She was a beautiful young woman,” Harris said. “Bad cops are bad for good cops. We need reform of policing in America and our criminal justice system. That’s why Joe and I will immediately ban choke holds and carotid holds.”
  • Pence: “[T]he family of Breonna Taylor has our sympathies. But I trust our justice system,” Pence said. “This presumption that you hear from Joe Biden and Kamala Harris that America is systemically racist, and as Joe Biden said, he believes that law enforcement has an implicit bias against minorities, it’s a great insult to the men and women who serve in law enforcement.”

On trade:

  • Harris: “The vice president earlier said it’s what he thinks as an accomplishment that the President’s trade war with China,” Harris said. “You lost that trade war. You lost it. What ended up happening is because of a so-called trade war with China, America lost 300,000 manufacturing jobs.”
  • Pence: “Lost the trade war with China? Joe Biden never fought it,” he said.

On climate change:

  • Harris: “Let’s talk about who is prepared to lead our country over the course of the next four years on what is an existential threat to us as human beings. Joe is about saying, ‘We’re going to invest in renewable energy,’ it’s going to be about the creation of millions of jobs, we will achieve zero emissions by 2050, carbon neutral by 2035. Joe has a plan,” Harris said.
  • Pence: “There are no more hurricanes today than there were 100 years ago, but many climate alarmists use hurricanes and fires to try and sell the Green New Deal,” Pence said.
 

CNN Instant Poll: Harris seen as winner in a debate that matched expectations

Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris waves as she arrives on stage for the vice presidential debate with Vice President Mike Pence on Wednesday, Oct. 7, at Kingsbury Hall on the campus of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City.

More Americans said Sen. Kamala Harris did the best job in the vice presidential debate tonight, according to a CNN Instant Poll of registered voters who watched. About six in 10 (59%) said Harris won, 38% said Vice President Mike Pence had the better night.

Those results roughly match voters’ expectations heading in to the debate. In interviews conducted before tonight’s debate, 61% of these same voters said they expected Harris to win, 36% thought Pence would. 

Harris did improve her favorability rating among those who watched, according to the poll, while for Pence, the debate was a wash. In pre-debate interviews, 56% said they had a positive view of Harris, that rose to 63% after the debate. For Pence, his favorability stood at 41% in both pre- and post-debate interviews. 

Both candidates who took the stage tonight are broadly seen as qualified to be president: 65% said Pence is qualified to serve as president should that become necessary, 63% said the same about Harris. 

The CNN post-debate poll was conducted by SSRS by telephone and includes interviews with 609 registered voters who watched the Oct. 7 vice presidential debate. Results among debate-watchers have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 5.3 percentage points. Respondents were originally interviewed Sept. 30 to Oct. 4 either by telephone or online, and indicated they planned to watch the debate and would be willing to be re-interviewed when it was over. Respondents initially reached online are members of the SSRS Opinion Panel, a nationally representative probability-based panel.

CNN’s David Chalian breaks down the numbers:

01:47 - Source: CNN

 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment